The Cloud Foundation: AWS vs. GCP vs. Hybrid Models
Kenya's betting industry presents a unique case study in cloud infrastructure strategy, with operators choosing different paths based on their specific needs for scalability, compliance, and cost management.
Likely using AWS for compliance with global betting regulations[citation:6]
Pan-African operations supporting high traffic volumes[citation:8]
Migrated to GCP in 2021 for application hosting and computing services[citation:5]
Infrastructure Strategy Analysis
AWS (SportPesa Model)
Regulatory Compliance
Specialized architectures for jurisdictional requirements[citation:6]
GCP (Odibets Model)
Application Hosting
Google Cloud Platform for computing services[citation:5]
Hybrid Approach
Multi-Cloud Strategy
Leveraging AWS Local Zones for latency-sensitive operations[citation:6]
The choice between cloud providers reflects strategic priorities around compliance, performance, and cost. SportPesa's likely AWS deployment aligns with industry standards for regulated betting markets, where AWS offers specialized reference architectures for sports betting that address different regulatory requirements[citation:6]. These architectures can handle scenarios where regulations require specific components (like sportsbook, wallets, and player account management) to be deployed within regulated jurisdictions.
"Sports betting applications on AWS can be deployed to address different regulatory requirements. AWS Local Zones and AWS Outposts help address challenges when regulations require that components be deployed within regulated jurisdictions."
— AWS Sports Betting Architecture Documentation[citation:6]
Odibets' migration to Google Cloud Platform in 2021 represents a different approach, focusing on application hosting and computing services optimized for their specific operational needs[citation:5]. This choice may reflect different priorities around data analytics capabilities, cost structure, or existing technical expertise within their engineering team.
Contact: ads@openbook.co.ke
Core Technical Architecture: Microservices & Containerization
Modern betting platforms have evolved from monolithic applications to microservices-based architectures that enable scalability, reliability, and rapid feature development. The industry standard approach involves containerized deployments managed through orchestration platforms.
Typical Sports Betting Platform Architecture
Representative architecture based on industry standards for platforms like SportPesa and Betika[citation:1][citation:3][citation:4]
| Architecture Layer | SportPesa/Betika Standards | Odibets Implementation | Purpose & Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontend Development | React Native, Flutter (cross-platform)[citation:1][citation:3] | Mobile apps + USSD/SMS betting | User interface across iOS, Android, web; critical for UX |
| Backend Framework | Node.js, Python (Django/FastAPI), Java Spring Boot[citation:1][citation:3] | Likely similar stack for real-time processing | Business logic, betting engine, transaction processing |
| Container Orchestration | Docker + Kubernetes (Amazon EKS)[citation:1][citation:6] | Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) on GCP | Scalability during peak events; 99.9% uptime requirement |
| Real-time Data | WebSockets, Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK)[citation:1][citation:6] | Similar real-time streaming required | Live odds updates, in-play betting, match tracking |
| Database Systems | PostgreSQL/MySQL (transactions), Redis (cache), MongoDB[citation:1][citation:3] | Cloud database services on GCP | Transaction integrity, performance, flexible data models |
Sources: Industry technical standards and platform-specific implementations[citation:1][citation:3][citation:4]
The architecture is designed for extreme scalability during peak load. During major football matches, platforms must handle thousands of bets per second, requiring:
- Elastic Scaling: Containerized services that automatically scale based on demand
- Real-time Processing: Streaming data pipelines using technologies like Apache Kafka[citation:6]
- Geographic Distribution: Edge computing through AWS Local Zones or similar for low-latency betting[citation:6]
- Redundancy: Multi-availability zone deployments with automatic failover
Odibets' specific implementation on Google Cloud Platform suggests they leverage GCP's managed Kubernetes service (GKE) for container orchestration, along with other GCP services for database, caching, and messaging that parallel the AWS services used by other platforms[citation:5].
Specialized Betting Components & Third-Party Integrations
Beyond the general cloud infrastructure, betting platforms rely on specialized components and third-party services that are unique to the gambling industry. These integrations represent critical points of differentiation and operational capability.
| Integration Type | Primary Providers | Cost Range | Function & Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds & Data Feeds | BetRadar, Sportradar, Betgenius[citation:1][citation:4] | $4,000 - $7,000+ | Real-time odds, scores, statistics; core betting product |
| Payment Processors | M-Pesa, Airtel Money, card networks, banks | $3,000 - $5,000+ | Deposits/withdrawals; critical for user trust & convenience |
| KYC & Identity Verification | Specialized KYC/AML providers | Varies by volume | Regulatory compliance, fraud prevention, age verification |
| Customer Engagement | OneSignal (used by Odibets)[citation:5], Firebase, Twilio | Usage-based pricing | Push notifications, promotions, user retention |
| Collaboration Tools | Google Workspace (Odibets)[citation:5], Microsoft 365 | Per-user licensing | Internal operations, team coordination |
Cost estimates based on development guides for similar platforms[citation:4]
The Betting Engine: Core Intellectual Property
At the heart of every platform lies the proprietary betting engine – the software component that:
- Calculates Odds: Processes real-time data feeds to determine and update odds
- Manages Risk: Implements trading models to balance book exposure
- Processes Bets: Validates, accepts, and records wagers with transaction integrity
- Settles Outcomes: Automatically determines winners and processes payouts
This engine is typically built using Python, Java, or Node.js and stores critical data in low-latency databases like Amazon DynamoDB (in AWS implementations) for odds storage[citation:1][citation:6]. The architecture ensures that odds can be updated in real-time during live events while maintaining consistency across millions of users.
Odibets' technology stack includes specific tools like OneSignal for customer engagement (adopted in 2022), indicating their focus on user retention through targeted notifications and promotions[citation:5]. This aligns with industry trends where engagement tools become increasingly sophisticated as markets mature.
Security, Compliance & Regulatory Technology
Given the financial nature of betting and strict regulatory environments, security and compliance technology represents a significant portion of the technical stack. Kenya's Betting Control and Licensing Board (BCLB) approved 99 gaming companies for licensing in the 2025/2026 financial year, including SportPesa (under Milestone Games Limited), Betika, and Odibets (under Kareco Holdings Limited)[citation:2]. This regulatory oversight drives specific technical requirements.
Regulatory Compliance Architecture
AWS reference architectures specifically address three deployment scenarios for regulated betting markets[citation:6]:
Scenario 1: All Components on AWS
When regulations allow cloud deployment with data replication to regulated jurisdiction
Full Cloud BenefitsScenario 2: Player Components Outside AWS
When player account management & wallets must be deployed within jurisdiction
Hybrid ApproachScenario 3: All Core Components Outside AWS
When sportsbook, wallets, PAM, and odds engines must run within jurisdiction
On-Premises with Cloud EdgeThese architectural patterns demonstrate how cloud providers have developed specialized solutions for regulated betting markets. The complexity increases when regulations require specific components to operate within national borders, potentially necessitating hybrid architectures that combine cloud services with on-premises or localized deployments[citation:6].
Security Implementation Standards
Betting platforms implement multiple security layers:
- Network Security: AWS WAF protection against DDoS attacks, bots, and account takeover attempts[citation:6]
- Data Encryption: End-to-end SSL encryption, PCI DSS compliance for payment processing[citation:1]
- Identity Management: Multi-factor authentication, role-based access controls
- Fraud Prevention: Real-time monitoring systems for suspicious betting patterns
- Data Protection: Compliance with GDPR and local data privacy regulations[citation:4]
The licensing of 99 companies by BCLB indicates a maturing regulatory environment that demands sophisticated compliance technology[citation:2]. Platforms must maintain audit trails, implement responsible gambling features (like deposit limits and self-exclusion), and ensure age verification—all requiring specialized technical implementations.
Strategic Insights: Technology as Competitive Advantage
SportPesa's likely AWS deployment prioritizes regulatory compliance and global scalability[citation:6], while Odibets' GCP choice[citation:5] may optimize for cost and specific technical capabilities. Betika's pan-African expansion[$5.5M+ revenue][citation:8] requires infrastructure that supports multiple regulatory regimes.
Containerized deployments (Docker + Kubernetes) allow independent scaling of components during peak loads and rapid deployment of new features. This architecture has become industry standard for handling the extreme scalability requirements of live sporting events.
Reliance on odds providers (BetRadar, Sportradar), payment processors (M-Pesa), and engagement tools (OneSignal) creates both capability and dependency. Platform differentiation increasingly comes from how these integrations are implemented and optimized.
BCLB oversight[citation:2] and specific jurisdictional requirements force architectural decisions about data localization, component deployment, and audit capabilities. Cloud providers have developed specialized patterns for these regulatory constraints[citation:6].
While much infrastructure uses standard components, the proprietary betting engine—with its odds calculation, risk management, and settlement logic—represents the fundamental intellectual property and competitive differentiator for each platform.
Future Trajectories: AI, Blockchain & Emerging Technologies
The technology stack of Kenyan betting platforms continues evolving, with several emerging trends likely to shape future development:
- AI & Machine Learning Integration: Predictive analytics for personalized odds, fraud detection, and customer behavior analysis
- Blockchain Applications: Transparent transaction records, provably fair betting systems, and cryptocurrency integration
- Enhanced Real-time Capabilities: Lower latency betting, more sophisticated in-play markets, and immersive experiences through AR/VR
- Regulatory Technology: More automated compliance systems, real-time reporting to authorities, and advanced responsible gambling tools
- Cross-Platform Expansion: Deeper integration with social media, messaging platforms, and emerging digital ecosystems
Odibets' recent adoption of tools like OneSignal (2022), Salesforce Audience Studio (2022), and Microsoft Clarity (2022) indicates an ongoing modernization strategy focused on customer engagement and analytics[citation:5]. This pattern suggests that as the market matures, differentiation shifts from basic functionality to sophisticated user experience and engagement capabilities.
The BCLB's licensing of 99 companies suggests a crowded but regulated market where technology will increasingly determine competitive advantage[citation:2]. Platforms that can leverage their technology stack for better user experiences, more innovative products, and more efficient operations will likely emerge as leaders in Kenya's next-generation betting landscape.
Related Research Publications
Explore related articles from our research series on Kenya's betting ecosystem:
From M-Pesa to Millions
How mobile money integration created the foundation for Kenya's betting technology stack
Business AnalysisSportPesa vs. Betika
The competitive battle between Kenya's betting giants and their strategic technology investments
TechnologyCryptocurrency Betting in Kenya
How blockchain and digital currencies might integrate with existing betting technology stacks